Rapaport
Certification Seminar Reveals Stunning Statistics
Saville Stern, COO of Rapaport moderated a discussion at JCK
Las Vegas about diamond grading certificates.
I found it quite condescending the way he introduced the retail
panelists and announced how proud he was to “include them in the diamond industry.” AS IF RETAILERS AREN’T!!! As one of the panelists stated, “it is up to
us to get the diamond the last 18” into the customer’s hands.”
Discussions continued around the effect of inconsistencies
between grading labs all through the supply chain; from site-holders through to
the consumer. The retail panelists did a
great job of explaining how certs affect their businesses. None seemed to dispute the fact that GIA was
the originator of diamond grading standards; having the most comprehensive
definitions of what constitutes different clarity grades, and with diamond
color masters indelibly established. The
issue of “SI3” clarity grading was brought-up, but Martin Rapaport emphatically
stated that including it in his pricing report was only a reflection of how
site-holders were conducting business.
At the end of the session, Stern delivered some compelling
statistics as promised. Following is a
comparison of selling prices between different gem labs:
AGS 106
GIA 100
HRD 93
IGI 86
EGL USA 69
EGL Israel 61
EGL Hong Kong 51
In other words, a GIA certificate that says: “SI1, H, VG,
VG, VG” that a dealer pays $10,000 for would fetch only $6,100 to $6,900 from
EGL. There was no indication where EGL
Canada or GemScan compare. In the
highest echelon of size and quality all other labs sold at a discount against
GIA. Does this mean that GIA’s paper is
more valuable? No! It means that AGS and GIA are holding truer
to the established, standardized definitions of grading, and the other labs are
ignoring these definitions to give the purchaser an artificially inflated
value.
With a quick-check of diamond pricing charts, that means an
EGL VS1/G equates to the value of a GIA SI1-SI2/H, or an EGL SI2/H is worth the
same as a GIA I1/I-J. Ronnie Cox from
AGS acknowledges that between grading labs there could easily be a single
clarity grade difference. After hearing
that, an audience member pointed out that one grading lab could be a step
higher and another a step lower. That
makes a two-grade difference between the highest and lowest labs. AAARGHH!
I think we should just do our best to purchase assuming that
“seeing is believing” and sell to the public according to Todd’s
three-clarity-grade system!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.