When someone tries to sell you something based on “statistics”
you can take it with a grain of salt, or you can analyze the analysis. In other words, you can be skeptical or
scientific. Having studied behavioral
science, including statistics, in university I make it a game to pick-apart
useless statistics.
Good stats are ones that have poled a statistically
significant number of people within a population. Great
stats are ones that pole a sufficient
number and variety of the kind of population
you’re interested in selling to. If
you want to know how people are going to respond to a jewellery line in Grande
Prairie, Alberta and you’re given statistics accrued mainly from urban United
States buyers, then you may not learn what you need to know.
Advertising reps throw around statistics like they are an
instant roadmap to success. The truth is
that there are so many measurements taken by the ad industry (and the new car
industry too) that every media outlet can pick and choose the most compelling
statistics to make themselves look good.
Who do you think pays for that research and why?
Knowing what I know about standard deviation, mode, mean,
median and statistical significance, I think the best policy is to take stats
with a grain of salt. When it comes to
advertising, hold your ad-rep accountable for results. When he or she says that an advertising plan
will generate increased business for you whithin a certain segment of buyers,
make your decision, run the ads, compile your own statistics and then report
back the results. Don’t let them use objective
measurements to sell you something with subjective results.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.